Monday, October 29, 2007

What's going on at Grace Episcopal - Ocala?




I saw a passing reference to the Rev. Don Curran's church, Grace Episcopal Church in Ocala, dissolved as of Sept. 14. For those of you who may not be familiar, Curran has been one of the biggest advocates of schism in the Diocese of Central Florida. He was pushing hard for schism and to keep the property in meetings with Bishop John W. Howe back in May and June, at Diocesan board and standing committee meetings. Curran was quite put out because Howe took the position Curran and other dissidents can leave, but they can't leave with the property.

I went to the Florida Department of Corporations Web site, sunbiz.org, and looked up the church, registered like other churches as a non-profit corporation in Florida. It is indeed, administratively dissolved as of Sept. 14 2007. I put in a call to the department. One of the administrators explained that an annual report was due May 1. With no report received as of September, the state declared the corporation dissolved. The church can file the annual report and do some paperwork to become reinstated.

With no annual report on file now, almost six months after its due date, the question is begged, what's going on?

Remembering the other Grace Church, in Colorado Springs, Co., where the pastor, Don Armstrong, was later found guilty in an ecclesiastical court of misappropriating funds just before he jumped to CANA, some questions should be asked.

There's no reason to believe Curran has taken money for personal use. BUT, is Grace Ocala hiding funds and assets in preparation for a break from the Episcopal Church? What are they doing with the church's income?

They've already stripped "Episcopal" from the church's name, calling it "Grace Church In the Anglican Tradition," according to the church Web site, which also informs us, "On Sunday, November 4th, Bishop Ben Benitez former Grace rector and Bishop of Texas, will be at Grace Church to confirm this coming Sunday at the 8:50 service."

Are Bishops John Howe and Hugo Pina Lopez considered tainted now?

Perhaps someone out there will tell us what's going on.


For a good summary of the Don Armstrong case with links to other sites, go to Thinking Anglicans

For more on the standing committee and board meetings, go to my entries No Claim to Sainthood July 11 and No Claim to Sainthood July 15.

The site shows Grace Ocala filing late last year, but apparently, nothing's been filed this year. To view the sunbiz.org page on Grace Ocala, go here.

UPDATE 8:40 p.m. 10-29-07 - Grace Episcopal Ocala has been reinstated by the Florida Division of Corporations, sometime since my posting around 1:30 p.m. today. Coincidence? Probably!

I still want to know what's going on there, and take a look at the annual report, once it's posted.

Thursday, October 25, 2007

Steaming correspondence



This really steams my fish. I don't expect separatist parishes to pay much attention to the lamented correspondence from the Archbishop of Canterbury to Bishop John Howe, telling Howe to counsel dissident rectors against disaffiliating at this time.

No, what bothers me is these rectors' supposition they will continue to have leadership roles in the diocese, even as they proceed with leaving the diocese and the Episcopal Church. This being Central Florida, it could happen. It shouldn't be allowed to happen.

Not that I even approve of the bishop allowing them to present him proposals. Seems to me like it should be the other way around. HE is the bishop, and has the power, though priests like Don Curran have had an inordinate amount of power in this diocese. That's part of the problem.

Read this:

From The Living Church Foundation at http://www.livingchurch.org. I couldn't get a link to the article to work. Once you're on the page, look under "Latest News" and click on the article.

Letter Doesn’t Sway Central Florida Parishes
10/24/2007

A letter from Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams to Bishop John W. Howe of Central Florida has changed nothing for the rectors and wardens of seven parishes and two church plants in that diocese, said a spokesperson for the group.

“We remain committed to disaffiliation from The Episcopal Church and continue in discussion with Bishop Howe over that process,” said the Rev. Don Curran, rector of Grace Church, Ocala, and president of the standing committee. “We want to handle this as expeditiously as possible, but there is no established deadline.”

Fr. Curran said he and the other clergy were shown Archbishop Williams’ letter by Bishop Howe during a meeting Oct. 18 at the diocesan headquarters in Orlando. The meeting was scheduled after Fr. Curran approached Bishop Howe on behalf of the group. Under terms agreed to during the meeting, each parish will submit a proposal for consideration by the bishop.

The rector of one of the parishes, the Rev. Lorne Coyle of Trinity, Vero Beach, is a candidate for election to the standing committee this year. Fr. Curran said both he and Fr. Coyle remain ready to serve in whatever leadership capacity beyond their parish that they are asked until they are received into another province.

Steve Waring

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Of wine-tastings, B-17s, and a spot of fun



Lest you think Saint Pat spends all her time worrying over the state of the Anglican Communion and separatist parishes in Central Florida, let me assure you, she's been having some fun lately. It's been most needed.

First, friends took me out Friday night for our annual wine-tasting. This is a local tradition and fundraiser. It always falls near my birthday, and the admission ticket is my birthday present. It involves wandering from one station to another in our little downtown, tasting all the wine you can hold down. A few yuckky samples went into bushes, but I enjoyed quite a few more, and restrained myself, didn't drink TOO much - and I had a designated driver. We met some other friends of mine at I-Hop for late-night coffee.
Saturday, I had lunch with friends and porch-sat, then went to another friend's house for a showing of My Fair Lady, one of my favorite musicals from my youth. Some of it is really dated now, but Rex Harrison can still charm the birds off the trees.

Sunday I went to church, then laid around the house and recuperated from earlier weekend activities. I napped and watched movies on TV.

Monday, oh boy, oh joy, I got to go for a ride on a B-17 Flying Fortress. That's the big bomber that flew missions from England over Europe, and helped us trounce the Nazis in World War II. The ride was a job perk - a publicity flight for the touring aircraft, Aluminum Overcast. She's lovingly restored and maintained.

The plane


What a great experience. Some of you know I have a private pilot's license. I never got to pilot anything like a B-17. What an awesome experience to go up in one!
Here's the take off. Pardon the jiggling camera.

video

The flight was smooth, with the B-17's four radial engine purring like four big cats in a small room.




video




Our intrepid pilots, Dave and Bob, after a perfect landing.


What great days!

Thank you Lord, for great friends to share life, and the great experiences you give us.

Monday, October 22, 2007

Bowing to the 'Bullydox" of the Communion



Tip of the wimple to the listserv member who posted this link to Island Priest, who is a very angry priest indeed, after reading correspondence between Archibishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams and Bishop John Howe of Central Florida.

While, as others have noted, the ABC's e-mail was a personal note to a bishop and not intended to state polity or official policy, it can certainly be held to the light, and help us see the ABC's thinking.

His thinking seems fuzzy.

Here's a snippet from Island Priest's post. It shows the depth of feeling of betrayal many of us have felt toward the ABC, especially in the last year (to me, at least. Where his thinking doesn't seem vague and confused, it seems plain wrong). Read this:

Perhaps more significantly, though, it is the betrayal of beliefs that Williams held dear for so long – right up, in fact, to the point where he became Archbishop of Canterbury, when – he says – unity became his ministry.

It is now clear that Williams is willing to abandon any individual and even whole Provinces of the Anglican Communion in the cause of “unity”.

I say “unity” in inverted commas because it is not really unity at all, but the bowing of a misguided, naive, and incompetent leader to what one person has described as the “Bullydox” of the Communion: those very narrow “Neo-Puritan” conservatives who wish to reinterpret Anglicanism to be something that is not the “large tent” we are all so familiar with but a prison wherein they alone guard and define what is “acceptable” for others to believe.

Saturday, October 20, 2007

The Bishop speaks


*********************************************
UPDATED 10-21-07: Charlotte forwarded Bishop Howe's pastoral letter to Simon Sarmiento at Thinking Anglicans, where he posted a portion it, along with some related items. It's garnering some comments.

NOTE: I amended the ninth paragraph to make a longer quote from the Archbishop of Canterbury, through the end of the paragraph, which was evidently Bishop Howe's intention. The original quotation ended at "provincial structure as such." I misinterpreted punctuation marks made squirrelly as they went from one operating system to another, and I apologize for that.
*********************************************

Here's Bishop John Howe's pastoral letter, to be read in the churches in the Diocese of Central Florida tomorrow (Sunday). Many people on both sides of the fence will be watching how Howe handles the situation. Demands to take the property are likely to come. I'm sure a few other parishes will jump if they see indications they can take it with them.

It is a sad time. I think of all all the manipulation and hoopla and playing on people's fears about the so-called "evil, liberal national church" used to work up parishes into leaving the church, and know it is a sad time.

Here is Bishop Howe's letter:

A Pastoral Letter from the Bishop of Central Florida

To be Read or otherwise Distributed in all of our Congregations

On Sunday, October 21, 2007

Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ:

The following agreed statement was released by all of the participants in a meeting held at Diocesan House on Thursday of this past week:

- On Thursday, October 18, 2007, the Rectors and Senior Wardens of seven Parishes of the Diocese of Central Florida and two Church Planters met with Bishop John W. Howe and representatives of the Diocese to discuss the possible scenarios by which all or part of the congregations may disaffiliate from The Episcopal Church.

- Each Parish will now enter a process of conversation and negotiation with the Diocese based on its particular circumstances. Bishop Howe reiterated his commitment to provide pastoral care both to those who leave and to those who wish to remain.

"All parties agreed to enter into these negotiations in good faith using Biblical principles in an effort to avoid litigation and scandal to the Church of Christ."

As Bishop of the Diocese of Central Florida, and as stated above, I remain committed to providing pastoral care both to those who wish to leave and to those who wish to remain. Individuals who wish to leave the Diocese of Central Florida and form another congregation are to be honored as brothers and sisters in Christ. The Diocese will do everything in its power to make their departure from the Diocese of Central Florida and The Episcopal Church a peaceful one without rancor or recrimination.

At the same time the Diocese is bound to work within the Constitution and Canons of The Episcopal Church which state that a Parish holds in trust all real and personal property for the benefit of the Diocese and The Episcopal Church. We have a solemn responsibility to protect the interests of the Diocese and the larger church. We cannot and will not abandon those who wish to remain as members of The Episcopal Church and we will work diligently to determine whether in fact there is a sufficient number of Episcopalians in a given congregation to constitute a viable continuing congregation able to meet and worship in its own current facilities.

We are developing a detailed protocol for dealing with those who wish to disaffiliate, and I will discuss it with the clergy at our annual Clergy Conference this week. Only after receiving their input will this protocol be finalized. For now, let me assure you that all of you will have a say in these decisions, and they will not be made by Rectors and Vestries acting alone.

This is a very painful time for many of us. I feel a great sense of personal loss in contemplating these departures, but I want to reassure you that the Diocese of Central Florida remains steadfastly committed to the Lordship of Jesus Christ, the authority and trustworthiness of God's word written, and the anointing and empowering of the Holy Spirit. As your Bishop I am committed to proclaiming the Gospel, to strengthening existing churches and planting new ones, and to raising up the next generation as faithful followers of Christ. The painful loss of some of our brothers and sisters in Christ will not divert us from any of these commitments.

I have said repeatedly that it is my desire to remain both an Episcopalian and an Anglican. In that regard, let me share something with you that the Archbishop of Canterbury has written to me just this past week: "Any Diocese compliant with Windsor remains clearly in communion with Canterbury and the mainstream of the Communion, whatever may be the longer-term result for others in The Episcopal Church. The organ of union with the wider Church is the Bishop and the Diocese rather than the Provincial structure as such ... I should feel a great deal happier, I must say, if those who are most eloquent for a traditionalist view in the United States showed a fuller understanding of the need to regard the Bishop and the Diocese as the primary locus of ecclesial identity rather than the abstract reality of the 'National Church.'"

We have a great and faithful Diocese, and with the help of the Lord himself, I am committed to making it even better. During this time of transition, I urge all of us to treat each other with great care and compassion. I ask your prayers for wisdom for all who will be involved in these discussions.

With warmest regards in our Lord,

John W. Howe, Bishop

Seven parishes to split from Central Florida?
Bishop to send pastoral letter to diocese



This is going around the listservs. Susan Shannon is high priestess to the AAC/Network/CCP.

The list is what one might suspect. Interestingly, only seven parishes are listed - not 17, as per earlier speculations. There could be a few more to jump ship, who knows, but this indicates the jumpers haven't been able to drum up that much support. Remember, at one time they planned to take the whole diocese out of the church. I recognize most of these rectors as the most vocal in spewing malcontentment against TEC, so these parishes come as no surprise.

Bishop John W. Howe sent out a notice to clergy yesterday:

Dear Brothers and Sisters,

I will be sending you a Pastoral Letter tomorrow, with the request that the rectors and vicars on this list either read or otherwise distribute it to your congregations on Sunday. It outlines where I think we may go from here, following yesterday's meeting at Diocesan House. I will want to discuss all of this with you at our Clergy Conference this coming week. These proposals will not be finalized until after that discussion. I welcome your comments and suggestions, as well as those of the members of your congregations, either shared with you or with me, directly.

Warmest regards in our Lord,

The Right Rev. John W. Howe
Episcopal Bishop of Central Florida



Here's the Shannon e-mail:


From: "Susan Shannon"
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 17:09:47 -0400


On Thursday, October 18, 2007, the Rectors and Senior Wardens of seven parishes of the Diocese of Central Florida and two church planters met with Bishop John W. Howe and representatives of the Diocese to discuss the possible scenarios by which all or part of the congregations may disaffiliate from The Episcopal Church.

Each parish will now enter a process of conversation and negotiation with the Diocese based on its particular circumstances. Bishop Howe reiterated his commitment to provide pastoral care both to those who leave and to those who wish to remain.

All parties agreed to enter into these negotiations in good faith using Biblical principles in an effort to avoid litigation and scandal to the Church of Christ .

The parishes are:
Cocoa , Gloria Dei Church
The Reverend Paul Young, Rector
Frank Travassos, Senior Warden
Crystal River , St. Anne�s Church
The Reverend Kevin Holsapple, Rector
Victor Hernandez, Senior Warden
Maitland, Church of the Good Shepherd
The Reverend John P. Nyhan, Rector
George C. Madill, Senior Warden
Mount Dora , St. Edward�s Church
The Reverend Woodleigh Volland, Rector
Charles Cronebaugh, Senior Warden
Ocala , Grace Church
The Reverend Donald J. Curran, Jr., Rector
Dr. Jim Wilkerson, Senior Warden
Vero Beach , Trinity Church
The Reverend D. Lorne Coyle, Rector
Mrs. Nancy N. Reichardt, Senior Warden
Winter Haven , Holy Cross Church
The Reverend Andrew S. Doan, Rector
Bill Johnson, Senior Warden

The church planters are from:
Lake Nona , St. Philip�s
The Reverend Paul Jagoe, Church Planter
Melinda Tedder, Lay Representative
Poinciana, St. Nicholas
The Reverend Geoffrey Boland, Church Planter
Charles Secord, Lay Representative

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

Celebrating St. Margaret, Queen of Scotland



Back to some posts about female saints!

I use James Kiefer's bios a lot, but I lifted this one from Notable Women Ancestors, which is full of colorful detail.

Margaret, Queen of Scotland
16 November 1093

A woman after me own heart: She got them all taking Communion!

When the people were afraid of taking Communion on Easter because they felt too sinful, she said, "if the Savior had intended that no sinner should receive the Holy Sacrament, He would not have given a command which, in that case, no one could obey. "We," said she, "who many days beforehand have confessed and done penance and fasted and been washed from our sins with tears and alms and absorption, approach the table of the Lord in faith on the day of His Resurrection, not to our damnation but to the remission of our sins and in salutary preparation for eternal blessedness."

Amen.

St. Margaret, Queen of Scotland

Margaret was born around 1045 in Hungary, the daughter of the exiled English Prince Edward "the Outlaw" Atheling of the English royal house of Wessex, and a German Princess named Agatha. Margaret was raised in the court of St. Stephen, King of Hungary. In 1057 when she was about 12, Margaret and her family returned to England, where the king was St. Edward the Confessor.



After the Norman conquest in 1066 and after her father's death in 1068, Agatha with her son and two daughters resolved to return to Hungary and embarked with that intent. Their ship was driven up the Firth of Forth to Dunfermline, where Malcolm III, king of Scotland, received them hospitably and granted them refuge. He very soon offered the whole family a permanent home with him and asked that the Princess Margaret should become his wife. Margaret, who was very devout and much impressed with the futility of earthly greatness, had very nearly determined to be a nun, but when Malcolm's request was made to Edgar, "the Childe said 'Yea,'" and Margaret was persuaded to marry the king as his second wife.

Malcolm III was born ca 1031 and founded the house of Canmore, which ruled Scotland for more than 200 years, and consolidated the power of the Scottish monarchy. He was the son of Duncan I, who was killed (1040) by Macbeth. Malcolm lived in exile until he defeated and killed (1057) Macbeth near Lumphanan in Aberdeenshire. He succeeded to the throne in 1058, and married Margaret ca. 1068-1070.

Her holiness and wisdom had an impact on Malcolm, causing him to be a better ruler. Malcolm regarded his wife with holy reverence, and with most devoted love followed her advice, and guided by her he became not only more religious and conscientious but more civilized and kinglike. The king's devotion to her and her influence over him were almost unbounded. He never refused or grudged her anything, nor showed the least displeasure when she took money out of his treasury for her charities. Although he could not read, he loved her books for her sake, handling them with affectionate reverence and kissing them. Sometimes he would take away one of her favorite volumes and send for a goldsmith to ornament it with gold and gems. When this was done, he would restore it to the queen as a proof of his devotion.

In addition to her influence with her husband and her sons, who later succeeded their father in ruling Scotland, Margaret took a direct role in helping the people of Scotland. She devoted time and money to works of charity, assisting the poor, the aged, orphans, and the sick. She also prevented a schism between the Roman Church and the Celtic Church, which had been cut off from Rome. In addition, she introduced European culture to Scotland, and did so more successfully than the forceful introduction in England under the Normans.

She was as saintly and self-denying on the throne as she could have been in the cloister. She at once perceived it to be her duty to benefit and elevate the people among whom it was her destiny to live, and this she undertook with the greatest of diligence and the most earnest piety. There existed so much barbarism in the customs of the people, so many abuses in the Church, so much on all hands to reform, that she called together the native clergy and the priests who had come with her, her husband acting as interpreter, and she spoke so well and so earnestly that all were charmed with her gracious demeanor and wise counsel and adopted her suggestions.

St. MargaretMargaret is credited with the introduction of English (Roman) usages into the Scottish church. Among other improvements, Margaret introduced the observance of Sunday by abstaining from servile work, "that if anything has been done amiss during the six days it may be expiated by our prayers on the day of the Resurrection." She influenced her people to observe the forty days' fast of Lent, and to receive the Holy Sacrament on Easter day, from which they had abstained for fear of increasing their own damnation because they were sinners. On this point she said that if the Savior had intended that no sinner should receive the Holy Sacrament, He would not have given a command which, in that case, no one could obey. "We," said she, "who many days beforehand have confessed and done penance and fasted and been washed from our sins with tears and alms and absorption, approach the table of the Lord in faith on the day of His Resurrection, not to our damnation but to the remission of our sins and in salutary preparation for eternal blessedness."

Margaret re-founded the monastery on the Island of Iona (originally founded by Saint Columba, an Irish missionary who found the monastery in 563 in an attempt to convert the Picts). One of her first acts as queen was to build a church at Dunfermline, where she had been married. She dedicated it to the Holy Trinity. She gave it all the ornaments that a church requires, amongst them golden cups, a handsome crucifix of gold and silver enriched with gems, and vestments for the priests. Her room was never without some of these beautiful things in preparation to be offered to the Church. It was like a workshop for heavenly artisans; capes for the singers, sacerdotal vestments, stoles, altar clothes were to be seen there; some made and some in progress. The embroideries were executed by noble young ladies who were in attendance on her.

No man was admitted to the room, unless she allowed him to come with her. She suffered no levity, no petulance, no frivolity, no flirtation. She was so dignified in her pleasantry, so cheerful in her strictness that every one both loved and feared her. No one dared to utter a rude or profane word in her presence.

She did much for the secular as well as for the religious improvement of her country. She caused traders from all lands to bring their goods, and thus introduced many useful and beautiful articles, until then unknown in Scotland. She induced the natives to buy and wear garments and stuffs of various colors. She is said to have introduced the tartans that afterwards became distinctive of Scottish costume. She instituted the custom that wherever the king rode or walked he should be accompanied by an escort, but the members of this band were strictly forbidden to take anything by force from any one, or oppress any poor person. She beautified the king's house with furniture and hangings, and introduced cups and dishes of gold and silver for the royal table. All this she did, not that she was fond of worldly show, but that the Court should be more decent and less barbarous than heretofore.

Numbers of captives were taken in the wars in raids between England and Scotland, and many English prisoners were living as slaves in Malcolm's lands. They were of somewhat better education and superior culture to the Scots and gradually advanced the civilization of their captors. Many of these were set free by the queen.

When she met poor persons, she gave them liberal alms, and if she had nothing of her own to left to give, she asked her attendants for something that she might not let Christ's poor go away empty-handed. the ladies, gentlemen, and servants who accompanied her took a pride and pleasure in offering her all they had, feeling sure that a double blessing would reward their alms when given through the saintly queen.

She provided ships at a place on the Firth of Forth, still called "The Queen's Ferry," that all persons coming from distant parts on pilgrimage to St. Andrews might be brought across the water free of charge. She also gave houses and servants on either shore for their accommodation, that they might find everything necessary for their repose and refreshment and might pay their devotions in peace and safety. Besides this, she built homes of rest and shelter for poor strangers in various places. From childhood she had diligently studied the Holy Writ and having a keen intelligence and an excellent memory, she knew and understood the Scriptures wonderfully well. She delighted to consult learned and holy men concerning the sacred writings, and as she had a great gift for expressing herself clearly, they often found themselves far wiser after a conversation with her. Her love for the holy books made her spend much time in reading and studying such of them as she had. She longed to possess more portions of the Word of God, and she sometimes begged Turgot and other learned clergymen to procure them for her. Margaret brought up her eight children very strictly and piously, instructing them in the Holy Scriptures and the duties of their station and associating them in her works of charity. She made a great point of their treating their elders with becoming respect. The fruit of her good training appeared in their lives for long years after her time.

There were many holy anchorites living in cells or caves in different parts of Scotland. These the queen occasionally visited, conversing with them and commending herself to their prayers. It was not uncommon in the ancient Celtic Church for devout secular persons to withdraw for a time from association with the rest of the world; they devoted themselves entirely to prayer and meditation for a long or short season, and then returned to the ordinary duties of life. A cave is still shown, not far from Dunfermline where tradition says this holy queen used to resort for solitude and prayer.


stained glass from the Chapel of St. Margaret in Edinburgh


Her abstinence was so great and her care for her own needs or gratification so small that her feast days were like the fast days of others. She fasted so strictly that she suffered acutely all her life from pain in her stomach, but she did not lose her strength. She observed two Lenten seasons in each year - the forty days before Easter and the forty days before Christmas. During these periods of self-denial, her biographer says that after sleeping for a short time at the beginning of the night, she went into the church and said alone three sets of Matins, then the Offices of the Dead, then the whole Psalter, which lasted until the priests had said Matins and Lauds. She then returned to her room and there, assisted by the king, she washed the feet of six poor persons who were brought there by the chamberlain. After this, she "permitted her body to take a littel slepe or nodde". When it was morning she began her works of mercy again; while the psalms were being read to her, nine little destitute orphans were brought, and she took each on her lap and fed it with her own spoon. While she was feeding the babies, three hundred poor persons were brought into the hall and seated all round it. As soon as Margaret and the king came in, the doors were shut, only the chaplains and a few attendants being present while the king and queen waited upon Christ in the person of His poor, serving them with food and drink. After this meal, the queen used to go into the church and there, with tears and signs and many prayers, she offered herself a sacrifice to God. In addition to the "Hours", on the great festivals, she used to repeat the Psalter two or three times, and before the public Mass she had five or six private Masses sung in her presence. It was then time for her own dinner, but before she touched it she waited on the twenty-four poor people who were her daily care at all seasons; wherever she happened to be, they had to be lodged near the royal residence.

She had a Gospel Book which she particularly prized and often read. It had beautiful illuminated pictures, all the capital letters shining with gold. One of her people, when passing through a stream let it fall into the water, but was not aware of his loss and went on. By-and-by the book was missing and was looked for everywhere, and eventually found at the bottom of the stream; the pieces of silk that were between the leaves to prevent the letters rubbing against each other were washed away; the leaves were shaken to and fro by the movement of the water, but not a letter was obliterated. She gave thanks for its restoration and prized it more than ever. This book, with the water stain on the last leaf, is now in the Bodleian Library.

For more than six months before her death, Margaret could not ride on horseback and was often confined to bed. Malcolm invaded England many times after 1068. supporting the claim of his brother-in-law Edgar Atheling to the English throne. In 1072, however, he was forced to pay homage to William I, and in 1091, to William II. Shortly before Margaret's death, the king, against her advice, made a raid into Northumberland where he and her eldest son, Edward were slain by Norman forces at Alnwick. Malcolm died at Alnwick Castle on November 13, 1093. The queen, who had a presentiment of it, and said to those that were with her, "Perhaps this day a greater evil has happened to Scotland than any that has befallen it for a long time."

Three days after this, she felt a little better and went into her oratory to hear Mass and receive the Holy Communion. She then returned to bed, and growing rapidly worse, begged Turgot and the others who were present to keep commending her soul to Christ with psalms. She asked them to bring her the black rood, which she had brought from Hungary and always regarded with great veneration. It was of gold set with large diamonds and said to contain a piece of the actual cross of Christ. She devoutly kissed and contemplated it, and when she was cold with the chill of death, she still held it in both hands and kept praying and saying the fifty-first psalm.

Her son Edgar, who had gone with the king to Northumberland, came into her room to tell her of the death of his father and brother. Seeing his mother was dying, he was afraid to tell her the sad news; but she said, "I know, I know, I conjure you to tell me the truth," and having heard it, she praised God and died, just three days after her husband, on November 16, 1093 at Edinburgh Castle. The Annals of Ulster for 1093 say, "Maelcolaim Mac Donnacha sovereign of Alban and Echbarda his son, slain by the Franks. His queen, viz. Margarita, died through grief before the end of (three) days."

While her body still lay in Edinburgh Castle, Malcolm's brother, Donald Bane, assisted by the King of Norway, attacked the castle, but he only watched the gate, thinking the other parts of the fortification inaccessible. Margaret's family and her faithful attendants escaped by a postern called the West Yhet, taking with them the revered corpse. A thick mist hid them from the enemy. They crossed the sea and arrived without hindrance at Dunfermline, where they buried her according to her own wish. Malcolm was succeeded briefly by his brother Donald Bane. Margaret's brother, Edgar the Atheling took Margaret's children to England, and for fear of the Normans, gave them privately to friends and relations to be brought up. He afterwards helped to restore them to their country. Margaret's sons continued her work, which contributed greatly to a golden age in Scotland for two hundred years after her death. First to the throne was son, Duncan II. Three other sons also succeeded to the throne: Edgar (r. 1097-1107), Alexander I (r. 1107-24), and David I (r. 1124-53). Margaret and Malcolm's daughter, Edith, also known as Matilda, became the wife of England's King Henry I, the fourth son of William the Conqueror.

Prayer (contemporary language)

O God, who called your servant Margaret to an earthly throne that she might advance your heavenly kingdom, and gave her zeal for your church and love for your people: Mercifully grant that we who commemorate her this day may be fruitful in good works, and attain to the glorious crown of your saints; though Jesus Christ our Lord, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever.

Psalm 146:4-9 or 112:1-9
Proverbs 31:10-11,20,26,28
Matthew 13:44-52 (Bap)

Monday, October 08, 2007

The Confession of St. Pat


I'm back from Virginia, where my mother was finally laid to rest next to my father, in view of the Blue Ridge Mountains, where they lived after Dad retired from the Navy.


Morning view of the Blue Ridge in the mist, from the burial site


I think of the life they had together there, in the mountains -- their dreams, their plans for the future, so many years ago -- and wonder, is there any meaning to all this? What's the point of living, breathing, hoping, to have it all reduced to ashes and dust?

The logical part of my mind argues life is a purposeless endeavor, a joke on humankind, who presumes to more, but nothingness comes in the end. There's no grand purpose or design to our being. We just live our little bit and die, to sleep, to dream no more.

Nothingness. Love and dreams vanquished, life often ended in suffering.

Yet, I am convinced there is more. I have experienced the love of Christ, who came searching for me, and who has protected me. I believe what he said. I know my mother is precious to him, and she is healed and whole, and made beautiful.

It is in Christ, in God, we live and move and have our being, and he is eternal. I do not know his plans, but I know he will never desert us.

He is my savior, whom I shall see with my own eyes.

As for me, I know that my Redeemer lives
and that at the last he will stand upon the earth.
After my awaking, he will raise me up;
and in my body I shall see God.
I myself shall see, and my eyes behold him
who is my friend and not a stranger.

(from the liturgy for burial in the Book of Common Prayer)

Wednesday, October 03, 2007

More from the Bishop



Diocese of Florida Bishop John W. Howe, perhaps in order to calm down speculation in the diocese (see last post), issued this one to affirm that "dissidents" can leave, but they can't take the property with them into CANA AMiA, etc., etc.

This is an echo of what I've seen quoted of the Presiding Bishop - she will be watching, and no hijackings of church property will be allowed.

Grandmere Mimi asked me why Howe went to the Common Cause Partners shish-ka-bob, although only for the last day, according to people in the know. I can't pretend to know, but I would guess it's for two reasons: first, he is still in sympathy with their beliefs, and second, and more importantly, he sees himself wearing the mantle of peacemaker and diplomat between the church and the dissidents, in his new role assigned him by Presiding Bishop Schori. To do this, he would need to engage the dissidents in discussion, as well as see what they're up to.

I think we are blessed with a wise presiding bishop, who found a way to keep bishops like ours in the church. Those who voted for her to foster schism are being hoist high by their own petard.

Thanks be to God.

Here's Bp. Howe's e-letter of Oct. 2:


Dear Brothers and Sisters,

There has been a great deal of conversation over the past few years about whether or not those who wish to leave The Episcopal Church might "negotiate" with the Diocese of Central Florida to purchase church properties and affiliate with some other Province of the Anglican Communion. It is time to end these discussions. The simple answer is: No.

The Windsor Report and the several Communiques from the Primates of the Communion have said that the incursions by foreign Bishops and Archbishops are illegitimate. The Presiding Bishop has said that The Episcopal Church will not allow the purchase of any property by any group that seeks to affiliate with an offshore Province.

I will not permit the passage of any Resolution by the Diocesan Board, the Standing Committee or the Annual Convention of the Diocese of Central Florida that seeks to alter the accession clause in our Constitution to the Constitution and Canons of The Episcopal Church, or that seeks to transfer any property held by parishes in trust for the Diocese of Central Florida and The Episcopal Church.

If you must leave, for conscience sake, I will do all in my power to make your leaving amicable. But when you make the decision to leave you immediately cease being a member of The Episcopal Church and the Diocese of Central Florida. You immediately cease having any say in decisions regarding any congregation of the Diocese or its property.

Please be aware of this in any plans you might be making.

Warmest regards in our Lord,

The Right Rev. John W. Howe

Monday, October 01, 2007

Words and undercurrents


The listserv is buzzing about Bishop John Howe's missive about the Bishops' meeting. It was sent out, then revised for the diocesan newsletter. Here it is, with revisions noted:

The All-Important Meeting

From the October, 2007 Central Florida Episcopalian

Dear Diocesan Family,

I said last month that I did not think there would be any surprises in the meeting of the House of Bishops and the Archbishop of Canterbury. I was wrong. The House leaned much farther toward what the Archbishop and the Primates of the Anglican Communion asked of us than I believe anyone expected.

In the end we produced two statements (see links at left). One of them is a "contextual" narrative about the whole of our experience in New Orleans, touching upon a wide variety of specific topics. The other is our response to the requests made of us by the Primates in their Communiqué from Dar es Salaam last February.

In their Communiqué the Primates asked us to:

- Make an unequivocal covenant that the Bishops will not authorize any Rite of Blessing for same-sex unions in their Dioceses or through the General Convention, and

- Confirm that the passing of Resolution B033 of the 75th General Convention (in 2006) means that a candidate for Episcopal orders living in a same-sex relationship will not receive the necessary consents (from the Bishops as well as from the Standing Committees) until or unless some new consensus on these matters emerges across the Anglican Communion as a whole.

In my opinion, we did not fully comply with either of these requests, but we came much closer than I ever thought we would.

The Bishops made a distinction between "public Rites" and "private blessings." In many Dioceses permission to use officially authorized public Rites has been withdrawn, and the House as a whole has, indeed, confirmed that until or unless there is a "new consensus" there will be no such authorization. There is, however, an implicit acknowledgement that in some places private blessings are still being offered as part of the "pastoral response" the Primates themselves said might be called for.

In reaffirming B033 from last year's General Convention, the Bishops stated that "exercising restraint" means withholding consent, and that specifically pertains to non-celibate gay and lesbian persons.

Many voices have already been raised, denouncing the Bishops' Statement as "non-compliance." I disagree. I would characterize the decisions of the House of Bishops as being in partial compliance [changed from "very substantial" compliance] with what the Primates asked of us.

Unfortunately, the Bishops failed to even mention a third request from the Primates, that we put an end to the lawsuits that are being pressed in many Dioceses against congregations that are attempting to leave The Episcopal Church and yet retain "their" properties. [New paragraph]

In our failure to do all that the Primates asked of us I was unable to vote for the Bishops' Statement, [New] but I was grateful to see a far higher level of concern for the unity of the Communion evident throughout our meeting than I have ever witnessed previously. Whether or not that level was high enough remains to be seen. Ultimately, of course, it is for the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Primates to make that call.

On behalf of all the Bishops, I thank you for your prayers.

With love to all of you in our Lord,

+ John W. Howe


I'm not sure what the amendments mean. He obviously back-pedaled a bit on his approval of discussion and the HOB statement. Why he added in concerns about "putting an end to lawsuits" is the subject of speculation -- does the Bishop want to cut deals with parishes that want to leave the church?

Meanwhile, Bishop Howe apparently attended only the last day of the Network/Common Cause Partners meeting. Those Network people have been through more aliases than a two-bit grifter.

An Episcopal News Service article by May Schjonberg on the meeting, titled "Common Cuase bishops pledge to seek Anglican reconciliation," stated, "Duncan and others compared the steps taken during the meeting to those of the Reformation, the American Revolution, the U.S. Civil War and martyrdom."

"During his short homily at Eucharist, Duncan urged the congregation of about 100 to be fruitful even if their fruit is not what the world wants, and to be willing to face the consequences of their actions. Those consequences in the past, Duncan said, have included death."




Images of violence toward those who disagree run rampant at Stand Limp, as Father Jake documented in his entry Father Jake Stops the World: Who is Worth Killing?. Those guys got their guns, and they're ready to use them. It certainly calls up some images:


No Freudian symbolism here!

What's with all the uber violent imagery at Club Common Cause Partners?










Just what kind of social order are they seeking?